A Tutoring System That Simulates the Highly Interactive Nature of Human Tutoring
نویسندگان
چکیده
ion/specification relations Abstract:instance (instance:abstract): S2 instantiates the abstraction stated by S1, or S2 abstracts over the information presented by S1. Tutor: How can the acceleration be 0 if there are forces on it? Student: The sum of the forces equal 0 for there to be no acceleration. Tutor: That’s exactly right. The weight and the normal force are (in this case) equal and opposite. Explanation: “In this case” (as the tutor says), the weight and normal force being equal and opposite represent an instance of the abstraction “sum of forces equal 0.”instance (instance:abstract): S2 instantiates the abstraction stated by S1, or S2 abstracts over the information presented by S1. Tutor: How can the acceleration be 0 if there are forces on it? Student: The sum of the forces equal 0 for there to be no acceleration. Tutor: That’s exactly right. The weight and the normal force are (in this case) equal and opposite. Explanation: “In this case” (as the tutor says), the weight and normal force being equal and opposite represent an instance of the abstraction “sum of forces equal 0.” Set:member (member:set): S2 presents a member of the set referred to by S1, or S2 names the set to which an item mentioned by S1 belongs. Tutor: What does the problem ask for? Student: The magnitude of the acceleration Tutor: What type of acceleration? Student: Average Explanation: The tutor refers to acceleration as a set and prompts for a member of that set; the student gives the type of acceleration asked for in the problem. Whole:part (part:whole): S2 names a part of an object that S1referred to, or S1 names a part of an object named by S2. (In physics, “parts” are often vector components or the specific forces acting on an object.) Student: Acceleration would be plus. Tutor: Right, the x component of the acceleration would be plus. Explanation: The student names a vector (acceleration); the tutor refers to a specific component of that vector. Process:step (step:process): S2 presents a step that follows from the process or line of reasoning described by S1, or S2 describes the line of reasoning that leads to the step described by S1. Student: The acceleration is 0. Tutor: So then m a 0 Fnet T W and hence T W. Explanation: The student gives a step in a line of reasoning; the tutor expands the line of reasoning (process) that follows from that step. Object:attribute (units, direction, magnitude): S1 names an object or value; S2 specifies a property of that object—in particular, its units, direction, or magnitude. Student: Velocity is 14. Tutor: Right, 14 m/s. Explanation: The student provides a value for velocity; the tutor specifies its units. Term:definition (definition:term): S2 defines a term mentioned by S1, or S2 labels a statement by S1 with an appropriate term. Tutor: What is the definition of the average acceleration (in words or in mathematics)? Student: A (Vf Vo)/Tf To. Explanation: The tutor prompts the student to define average acceleration; the student does so. General:specific (specific:general): S2 names a state, object, or action that is related to the content in S1 but is more specific, or S2 is more general than the state, object, or action referred to in S1. Applies when none of the preceding relations apply. Student: Average acceleration can vary. Tutor: Right; it can go up above the average and down below it. Explanation: The tutor specifies how acceleration can vary. Other commonly occurring relations in physics tutoring Condition:situation (situation:condition): (a) S1 presents a condition or set of circumstances, and S2 states the situation that stems from or coincides with those conditions, or (b) S1 presents a situation, and S2 states the conditions or circumstances that explain that situation. Tutor: When do kinematics equations apply? Student: When the acceleration is constant. Explanation: This relation could be stated in conditional form: if acceleration is constant, then the kinematics equations apply. Compare: S2 compares an object, situation, or value referred to by S1 with some other object, situation, or value. Tutor: What is the net force that the air bag imparts to the driver? Student: Equal to the force the driver applies to the airbag. Tutor: Same direction? Student: No, opposite direction. Explanation: The tutor prompts the student to compare the value and direction of two. T hi s do cu m en t is co py ri gh te d by th e A m er ic an Ps yc ho lo gi ca l A ss oc ia tio n or on e of its al lie d pu bl is he rs . T hi s ar tic le is in te nd ed so le ly fo r th e pe rs on al us e of th e in di vi du al us er an d is no t to be di ss em in at ed br oa dl y. 1129 TUTORING SYSTEM
منابع مشابه
Pilot Test of a Natural-Language Tutoring System for Physics That Simulates the Highly Interactive Nature of Human Tutoring
This poster describes Rimac, a natural-language tutoring system that engages students in dialogues that address physics concepts and principles, after students have solved quantitative physics problems. We summarize our approach to deriving decision rules that simulate the highly interactive nature of human tutoring, and describe a pilot test that compares two versions of Rimac: an experimental...
متن کاملIs a Dialogue-Based Tutoring System that Emulates Helpful Co-constructed Relations During Human Tutoring Effective?
We present an initial field evaluation of Rimac, a natural-language tutoring system which implements decision rules that simulate the highly interactive nature of human tutoring. We compared this rule-driven version of the tutor with a non-rule-driven control in high school physics classes. Although students learned from both versions of the system, the experimental group outperformed the contr...
متن کاملThe Interaction Plateau: Answer-Based Tutoring < Step-Based Tutoring = Natural Tutoring
Face-to-face tutoring by an expert human tutor is widely thought to be more effective than intelligent tutoring systems (ITS), which are in turn thought to be more effective than computer-aided instruction (CAI), computer-based training (CBT), etc. The latter tutoring systems have students work out complex solutions on paper, then enter their answer into the tutor, which gives them feedback and...
متن کاملIdentification of the Quantitative Dimensions of Supplementary Private Tutoring among High School Students
Identification of the Quantitative Dimensions of Supplementary Private Tutoring among High School Students Y. Shiraavand* A. Ma’dandaar Aaraani, Ph.D.** I. Nikpey, Ph.D.*** To identify the quantitative dimensions of supplementary private tutoring, a cluster sample of 800 high school students was given a questionnaire on the subject. The collected data reveal that moti...
متن کاملWhen is Reading Just as Effective as One-on-One Interactive Human Tutoring?
Many human tutorial dialogues have a similar format (Graesser, Person & Magliano, 1995) wherein the tutor poses a question, the student answers it, and they work collaboratively to improve the student’s answer. We hypothesized that the well-known effectiveness of human tutoring was due to the last phase, and in particular, to the interactive nature of the tutorial dialogue there. To test the hy...
متن کاملKnowledge Navigator for Intelligent Collaborative E-Tutoring: A Proposed Framework using Fuzzy Cognitive Agent
With access to wide-ranging technologies, tremendous web data from heterogeneous sources and different learning abilities, it is desired to develop learner oriented knowledge navigation based tutoring system. The present study suggests a fuzzy cognitive agent based knowledge navigator for intelligent tutoring in a collaborative environment. It can be used to provide an insight to the cognitive ...
متن کامل